Stéphane Penso’s review
AT10: measured innovation in the service of performance · Padel Magazine
Article: Stéphane Penso · 2024-10-15
A firmer attacking response
Penso favors the 12K for forceful volleys and smashes in his comparison of the 2025 AT10 range. He finds it more explosive and precise in attacking play than the 18K Alum. That is the main reason to shortlist this version if you already generate controlled, confident swings.
Less help when defending
The same review gives the 18K a little more tolerance and easier ball release in defense. The 12K is the more rigid option, so its attacking advantage comes with a response that Penso considers better suited to experienced players. Compare the two under pressure at the back of the court, not just on a basket of smashes.
12K does not mean a softer AT10
NOX describes this 2025 model as solid and rigid, with a 12K carbon face and MLD Black EVA core. Within this particular generation, Penso's test also places it on the firmer side of the 18K. The red-accented teardrop is separate from the head-heavier 12K Attack.
Why the common core does not settle the choice
Penso’s range review identifies MLD Black EVA in both teardrops. It also describes the 12K as the more compact and rigid attacking option. That combination is why comparing isolated material names can mislead: a shared core does not make the complete rackets respond identically. Read the attack-versus-defence distinction alongside the shape and balance, then use a short-swing defensive return to decide whether the more demanding response is still manageable for you.
Separate contact features from finish
The review lists the same Exclusive Spin dual-texture concept, Custom Grip adjustment and replaceable Smart Strap across the range, with an extended handle. Inspect those features for fit, but do not let red accents or the textured face replace the playing comparison. Penso’s strongest case for 12K is the explosive, precise attacking contact. A surface treatment cannot compensate for repeatedly arriving late or striking away from the useful part of the face.
A reason to choose the 18K instead
If a clean overhead feels excellent but low defensive balls repeatedly finish short or escape your control, the more tolerant 18K Alum deserves the next trial. That follows the specific defensive difference Penso reports rather than a claim that everyone should buy the same model. Keep the same partner and feed for the comparison. If the 12K still gives controlled defence and the firm volley response you wanted, its attacking emphasis has a clearer place in your own game.
Manufacturer specifications
- Shape
- Teardrop
- Weight range
- 360–375 g
- Face
- 12K carbon
- Core
- MLD Black EVA
What to try on court
Consider this 2025 12K if you value a firm response for attacking volleys. If you want more help on slower defensive shots, the 18K Alum is the more relevant comparison.